You will also be interested in this

(on video) Interview with Jean Jouzel: Is global warming of human origin? French paleontologist Jean Jouzel tells us about humans’ responsibility…

By making this data accessible to all, the NGOs Data for Good and Aclarities aim to lift the curtain on the biggest polluters on the planet and the main culprits of current global warming; But also on companies that are involved in both current projects and projects planned for the coming years.

10 countries responsible for most fossil fuel emissions

All these 425 “air bombs” carboncarbon » represents a significant portion of broadcastbroadcast Number of greenhouse gases emitted by the fossil fuel sector: sites specified on the map are responsible for 45% of greenhouse gas emissions OilOil and gas, and 25% of coal emissions. 10 countries are responsible for two-thirds of the emissions of these “carbon bombs”: the United States (especially Texas and New Mexico), Canada, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, India, Iraq, Brazil, and Australia. In France, no extraction sites exist, but new projects are planned right next to our country: in the Bowland Shale in the north of England, near Warsaw in Poland, or even near Odense in Denmark.

The map data is even more comprehensive, including the names of the most polluting extraction companies, such as Exxon Mobil Corp (USA) and Energy Investment Corp (China), but also the banks that most participate in these projects, including ICBC (China) is also included. Also BNP Paribas (France).

Scientists worried about these 425 “carbon bombs”

article from Nathalie MayerNathalie MayerWritten on May 17, 2022

To limit global warming to +1.5°C above the pre-industrial average, we must reduce fossil fuel consumption. But what to do if production continues to increase? Even if production explodes? That’s the question raised by the 425 giant extraction projects uncovered by researchers today. Real “Carbon Bomb” In the hands of fossil fuel giants!

« Notre AddictionAddiction Fossil fuels are killing us. , The words are raw. Without any detour. These are what Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN), said on 1Is last April. then he called “Immediate efforts and transformertransformer To keep temperatures below 1.5 degrees Celsius, coal will be phased out in all countries and the expansion of oil and gas exploration will be stopped. Highlighting that coal, oil and gas production will need to be cut by more than half over the next decade if we plan to save our climate.

A few months ago, the European Investment Bank announced that it would end all support for projects involving fossil fuels. The International Energy Agency (IEA), for its part, called for an immediate end to fossil investments and about twenty countries committed themselves on the 26th.I Climate Conference of the Parties (COP26), to stop public financing of fossil fuel projects abroad. It seemed like the world was finally on the right track.

But today, a study conducted by researchers at the University of Leeds (United Kingdom) questions everything. It features at least 425 projects led by the biggest names in fossil fuels. The projects, which, in total, could be responsible for more than 646 billion tons of emissions carbon dioxidecarbon dioxide (C.O2, Real “Carbon Bomb” Distributed in 48 countries around the world. of “Carbon Bomb” Because 646 billion tonnes is a drain on our carbon budget if we hope to limit climate change to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

bombs should be defused immediately

In Canada, United States, Australia. In 2020, at least 60% of these projects were already producing gas or oil. big names of fuelfuel Shell, Gazprom, ExxonMobil, BP, PetroChina, Petrobras, ConocoPhillips or even Fossil beambeam There are plans to continue investing more than $100 million per day until 2030 to maintain them and develop those that are still missing.

Do you know ?

According to researchers at the University of Leeds (UK), the projects alone are capable of emitting more than a billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO)2) during their lifetime “to be eligible”qualifier of “Coal Bomb” , In view of this definition, the offshore gas fields of North Field (Qatar) won the news award “Carbon Bomb”In this world. The United States is the one that focuses most of these “Carbon Bomb” , No less than 22 of them for potential emissions of 140 billion tonnes of CO2, More than four times what the entire world emits in a year!

All this may be all aspects of 6I Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ipccipcc), published in recent months, confirms that our carbon emissions must be reduced to maintain our prospects for a livable future teretere, And that’s a study by the National Service astronauticsastronautics The British Met Office, together with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), show that the risk of temperatures rising by at least 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to the pre-industrial era over the next five years has never been higher. Was more important. They are now at 50%.

If we want to limit global warming, fossil fuel production must decline by 3% per year

But then, what is it about? a kind of « cognitive dissonance » What stops companies from changing their position despite the risks? a form of “Denial of the reality of global warming and its causes” , or simply uncontrolled greed and “Complete disregard for the communities most vulnerable to climate change”From the big names in fossil fuels?

Not sure we have time left to decide. In fact, to avoid a disaster scenario, we must split our CO emissions2 Up to two by 2030. And in response to the climate emergency, deactivate many of these “Carbon Bomb”May soon become a top priority. To this end, researchers at the University of Leeds suggest individual studies that would make it possible to include all dimensions of the issue in strategies. With the hope of better efficiency.

Categorized in: