Saturday, November 2, 2024
HomeUncategorizedSuper bonus disaster, how much it cost the Italians

Super bonus disaster, how much it cost the Italians

Total charges of Super bonus As of August 31, the payment from the state has almost arrived. 123 billion eurosAs of July 2020, estates with less than 500,000 beneficiaries are included, equal to 4% of 12.2 million buildings Resident in Italy. It was reported by the Research Office of the CGIA of Mestre. “At such a critical moment, where the next budget law will ask everyone to make sacrifices, spending more than 6 points of GDP to make a small number of households more efficient is beyond anyone with common sense. There’s anger,” he says. Note

How many interventions were made in Italy?

By August 31, renovations and building efficiency interventions through Super Bonus had been reached. 496,315 units. Although the costs incurred by the state are 123 billion euros, only 4.1% of the total residential buildings in Italy have benefited from the tax exemption.

At the regional level, Veneto It is the one that recorded the highest usage of Super Bonus. 59,652 affidavits, equivalent to 5.6% of existing residential buildings. It is followed by Emilia-Romagna with 44,438 operations (5.4%), Trentino-Alto Adige with 11,342 (5.4%), Lombardy with 78,125 (5.2%) and Tuscany with 38,532 operations (5.2%). In contrast, areas of Afternoon They used less motivation: Molise and Puglia They just inspired 2.9% Among its residential buildings, Calabria 2.6% and Sicily only 2.2%.

Below is a ranking of the Italian regions with the highest percentage of homes that have superbonus interventions:

  • Veneto: 59,652 interventions (5.6%);
  • Emilia Romagna: 44,438 interventions (5.4%);
  • Trentino-Alto Adige: 11,342 interventions (5.4%);
  • Lombardy: 78,125 interventions (5.2%);
  • Tuscany: 38,220 interventions (5.2%);
  • Lazio: 38,532 interventions (4.8%);
  • Umbria: 9,338 interventions (4.7%);
  • Friuli-Venezia Giulia: 13,669 interventions (4.5%);
  • Marche: 13,825 interventions (4.4%);
  • Abruzzo: 14,787 interventions (4.2%);
  • Piedmont: 36,042 interventions (3.8%);
  • Basilicata: 5,527 interventions (3.5%);
  • Campania: 29,708 interventions (3.3%);
  • Aosta Valley: 1,409 interventions (3.3%);
  • Liguria: 8,336 interventions (3.2%);
  • Sardinia: 15,920 interventions (3.1%);
  • Molise: 3,161 interventions (2.9%);
  • Puglia: 27,510 interventions (2.9%);
  • Calabria: 15,910 interventions (2.6%);
  • Sicily: 30,864 interventions (2.2%).

At the national level, the average load per residential building carried by the state was 247.819 euros. Valle d’Aosta recorded the highest cost with €401,040 per property, followed by Basilicata (€299,963), Liguria (€298,314), Lombardy (€296,107) and Campania (€294,679). At the bottom of the ranking we find Veneto with an average price per building of 194,913 euros, Sardinia with 187,440 euros and finally Tuscany with 182,919 euros.

Minor environmental consequences

In general, with the so-called 110% super bonus, the state has spent a lot to improve energy efficiency. At least part of buildings in Italy. However, according to initial rumours, the measure appears to have mainly benefited property owners with good or high income potential rather than less affluent families, who often live in houses in a poor state of repair and Live with very low levels of energy efficiency. .

However, not everyone agrees that Super Ecobonus will contribute 110% to reducing pollutant emissions. Although there is no rigorous scientific evaluation from an ecological perspective, the lack of CO2 will be Contains a lot – The Research Office quoted the Bank of Italy as saying – the first evidence will show that in a best-case scenario the environmental benefits of the super-bonus will offset the financial costs in about 40 years.

With 123 billion we will have 1.2 million new public housing units.

Those who support and continue to defend this provision argue that we must consider not only the costs incurred by the state, but also the positive economic effects it creates: Higher tax revenue (Irpef, Ires, VAT, etc.), increase in employment, growth in GDP, energy savings and reduction in pollution emissions. However, an objection that CGIA refutes: “With 123 billion euros we could theoretically build. 1.2 million public housing400 thousand more than those in the country. With one important difference: otherwise we’d be doing the social justice action that the current initiative fearfully ignores.”

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments