It created a sensation months ago. The decision from Cassation Between which there was a difference. Approved speed cameras And speed cameras ApprovedWith the endorsement of Many Attributed only to other types of devices. The news paved the way for thousands. Appeals. Now the judiciary is also investigating.
Municipalities included.
to move there Office of the Public Prosecutor Of Padua The following Complaints of Motorcyclists Association. A presumption of guilt hangs over some municipal administrations. A theoretical lie For installation of speed cameras for which necessary ministerial approval is not required. According to Article 483 of the Pakistan Penal Code, “Whoever falsely certifies to a public official in a public document, facts which the document purports to prove to be true, shall be punished.” Imprisonment for two years“
As reported. Roy Newsrelated to the installation of the case. The new Speed cameras Overall, there are municipalities affected by the installations. Padua, The fort, Fontaneva, Galera Veneta, Carmignano di Brenta, Camposampero, Cadoneghe It is raining in Sacco. e Villa del Conte. Apparently one of the two devices at Villa del Conte was dropped by Flaxman last January.
Complaints ofNational Association for the Protection of Road Users He writes that the protests against the administration began last April. Messenger. The Judicial Police has already received documents related to various administrative procedures and started investigation.
Speed Cameras: Prevention or Tools to Defeat Cash?
The Padua Prosecutor’s Office aims to determine whether, or how, the speed detection devices are installed correctly. Stopper to avoid Accidents Automotive, and not just for the purpose of bringing money into the coffers of various municipalities, as claimed by motorcyclist associations.
Approval and coordination.
According to the Court of Cassation, approval is merely a step towards obtaining homologation, because “it consists of a procedure that does not require comparison of the prototype with the characteristics considered to be basic or the regulations. with the specific requirements presented by” in a procedure that also has a necessary technical nature and this specific meaning is intended to guarantee the perfect functionality and accuracy of the electronic device.
Some Justices of the Peace have already quashed a number of fines based on speed detectors not being approved.
Mayors’ response
Padwa today gathered the sentiments of some mayors in the area. “They are Nurture Guys, when you do this you know where you’re starting and you don’t know where you’re going to end up”, declared Mayor Of Cadoneghe, Marco Cesaro. “It’s certainly not pleasant reading. to blame who are addressed to me, also because it is easy to show how many there are. Nonsense. But I no longer want to play this game where someone demands the right to attack and defame People making grievances and grievances against administrators and public workers does not seem serious to me”, Shisaro added.
There is only one way to avoid the penalty. Go slow. But what is the purpose of all these complaints? Run?”, asks himself. Mayor Of The fort, Luca Perobone. For Pierobon “the allegation of theoretical falsity makes no sense”, also because “those speed cameras have been around for years”. The mayor continued to argue that hitting mayors with complaints is the wrong way to go if the move is to change the law.