gave PensionOne of the problems most felt by Italians is being cheated by Strategy 2025. The league backs him up, making him a big promise outgoing flexibility. So on the text produced, he expresses frustration at a reform that once again fails to live up to the expectations of many workers and pensioners. According to the Under Secretary of Labor Claudio Durriganthis maneuver is not “League reform”, which aims to the contrary.Abolition of the Fornero Law EA Quota 41. In contrast, the current initiative focuses more on keeping people in work, with incentives and penalties that reduce the likelihood of early retirement.
This is not the strategy that the PML-N wanted.
The League promised its voters more freedom to choose the moment. Pension. For example, quota 41 was indicated as one of the central proposals. Kota allowed you to retire with it. 41 years of partnership without age limit. But it’s just one of the promises that didn’t find a place in the 2025 budget, which instead focuses on increasing barriers and penalties for those trying to leave the world of work early.
Under Secretary of Labor Claudio Durrigan He does not hide his disappointment: “This is not the league’s pension reform.” The undersecretary, however, does not completely close the door on possible changes. “It is possible to make better reforms in the coming years and improve the maneuver in Parliament,” he says, indicating the League’s willingness to intervene on gaps in the text. In particular, Durrigan aims to introduce measures to encourage early exit, even for those who are on the assistance system, and who are currently fined. Among these, supplementary pensions represent a potential area of intervention.
What are broken promises?
Several points are missing from the League’s election promises. The Fornero Law, for example, remains a mainstay of legislation, despite several declarations of its abolition. Even Pension guarantee for young vulnerable workers And the possibility of early retirement using supplementary funds, for those who do not meet the social allowance requirements, has been systematically excluded.
However, the categories most penalized by this reform remain numerous. gave NoFor those already facing penalties with the Women’s Option, see tougher conditions for early exits. This measure, originally designed to facilitate women workers, was limited to a few cases, leaving the majority of women of retirement age exposed (INPS data, compared to 11,594 last year). 2,749 in the first nine months of this year). Additionally, checks are cut by up to a third with recounts.
But also Millennials and Generation Z, for whom the situation is still complicated. With an increase to 64 years for early retirement, only the minimum social pensioners will be able to benefit from the move. “Whoever pays first, we owe it to the youth,” Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti said. Yet for young people whose work careers are intermittent, this promise looks like another disappointment: many of them will find it difficult to collect the contributions needed to access a decent allowance.