Do Ukrainian Elon Want a Stasty? Of course! But it was certainly not those who dropped the X network this week, vice versa. It seems very shameful in entering the truth.
This is a three -step story, such as Waltz … but ends badly for it Elon MuskElon MuskEven if he never recognizes it. First, its X network was widely hit by a large -scale DDOS attack. The denial of such a service is often an attack and is often the reality of malicious actors who have something to claim.
II, Elon Musk said during an interview Fox News The attack took place in Ukraine. The IP leaves of the attackers were located in the country that makes the news. Kasturi has always been very vague against Ukraine. He provided his star link network, but criticized its military use by Ukraine. He has also repeatedly demonstrated his contacts with Moscow with the story of Ukraine. Will Ukraine want it right now? Certainly, but is the DDOS attack a protest message for a country of war?
Here … during the third time, a group of Palestinian supporters called Dark Storm TeamClaimed responsibility for attacks in publications TelegramTelegram. Since then, Elon Musk has been silent. The official message has passed, “This is Ukraine!”. Unfortunately, if the matter falls, it is revealing some clear shortcomings in the arrival of the musk and the staff in the staff and some clear shortcomings in the X. IssueIssue Investment
In an interview, Elon Musk said that the attack on X came from Ukraine suggesting that it would be a process of state retaliation. © Fox
Who wants to be mustered?
First, no expert and, no doubt, the boss of X knows: The IP address is not enough to attribute cyber attack. The attackers are usually more smart. Worse now, according to WiredA researcher at CyberScureti, was able to determine that the Ukrainian attack was not even in the 20 major IP address.
The fact is that the easily that these DDOS attacks has dropped the network comes from something that the musk does not want to acknowledge. Still according to WiredWhich explains the effectiveness of this attack is that ServerServer The society was not just safe. Routine reservations rest on cloud flair. Service is used by X, as is a matter of detecting and reducing such attacks for many companies by refusing to serve. And these are the servers that are unsafe by cloud flair that have been attacked.
Faced with this weakness, to move the pill, Kasturi preferred to suggest state origin rather than acknowledge that X is not quite safe to counter simple DDOS attacks. But, in the end, this common threat is beyond the symbol of claims against musk and its companies. It is important to say that the billionaire billionaire has made many enemies in the shortest time. However, if a state wants to wear such a blow, it would be otherwise and certainly not happen to the DDOS attack, but it would have been more cautious and more effective. Only, it would have been very noisy.
